In India’s fast-growing two-wheeler market, buyers today are looking for more than just affordability. Motorcycles are now lifestyle choices—an extension of the rider’s personality. This is where two of the hottest contenders step into the spotlight: the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and the TVS Ronin.
Both bikes sit in a similar price bracket, but they are designed for completely different types of riders. The Hunter 350 embodies classic Royal Enfield DNA with its heritage-inspired minimalist design, while the Ronin goes the modern neo-retro path with advanced features and tech-oriented engineering.
So, which one should you choose? Let’s break it down in detail across design, performance, features, and value for money.
Price and Variants – Accessibility vs Affordability
Pricing is often the first deciding factor, especially for younger buyers in this segment.
- Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price: Starts at ₹1.37 lakh (ex-showroom) for the Retro variant, going up to ₹1.67 lakh for the top Metro Rebel trim.
- TVS Ronin Price: Starts slightly lower at ₹1.25 lakh, with the top variant priced at ₹1.59 lakh.
This means the Ronin offers a wider price spread and marginally better affordability, particularly for riders looking to get maximum features without stretching their budget past ₹1.6 lakh.
The Hunter, on the other hand, is positioned as the most affordable entry point into the Royal Enfield family, making it appealing for riders who have always wanted to own an RE but hesitated due to higher price tags of Classic or Meteor models.
Design Philosophy – Heritage vs Neo-Retro Modernis
When it comes to design, the two motorcycles couldn’t be more different.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 – Minimalism with Heritage Roots
- Compact and urban-friendly styling.
- Retro-inspired round headlamp, teardrop fuel tank, and clean lines.
- Feels like a shrunken-down Royal Enfield—lighter, tighter, and designed to appeal to city riders.
- Colors and trims are kept classic with subdued paint schemes and vintage-inspired graphics.
The Hunter looks best for those who want a timeless motorcycle that doesn’t scream for attention but makes its presence felt through simplicity and heritage.
TVS Ronin – A Blend of Past and Future
- Neo-retro design with a touch of futuristic appeal.
- Unique tank shrouds, sculpted panels, and LED headlamps.
- Modern proportions with an aggressive stance.
- Multiple finishes and paint schemes, including two-tone options.
The Ronin is more experimental and edgy, clearly targeted at riders who want a machine that reflects individuality and stands out in a crowd.
Engine and Performance – Steady Thump vs Agile Response
Both motorcycles deliver performance in their own way, but the differences are significant.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- Engine: 349cc, J-series, single-cylinder, air-oil cooled
- Power: 20.2 bhp
- Torque: 27 Nm
- Gearbox: 5-speed
- Kerb Weight: 181 kg
The Hunter’s engine is tuned for relaxed, torquey performance, ideal for city commutes and occasional highway rides. The heavier kerb weight lends stability but also makes it less flickable in dense traffic. It thrives on steady acceleration rather than outright speed.
TVS Ronin
- Engine: 225.9cc, oil-cooled, single-cylinder
- Power: 20 bhp
- Torque: 19.93 Nm
- Gearbox: 5-speed
- Kerb Weight: 159 kg
Though the Ronin produces slightly less torque, its lighter weight and sharper throttle response make it feel quicker in daily riding. It’s far more nimble in city traffic and inspires confidence for new riders who may find heavier bikes intimidating.
Verdict on Performance
- If you prefer a steady, thumpy ride with strong low-end torque, the Hunter wins.
- If you value responsiveness, agility, and lighter handling, the Ronin comes out ahead.
Features and Technology – Simple vs Feature-Packed
One of the biggest differences between these bikes lies in their feature sets.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Features
- Analog-digital instrument cluster.
- Optional Tripper navigation pod on select variants.
- Dual-channel ABS.
- USB charging port.
- LED tail lamp.
The focus here is on functionality without overwhelming the rider. The features complement the riding experience rather than dominate it.
TVS Ronin Features
- Fully digital instrument cluster with Bluetooth connectivity.
- Turn-by-turn navigation.
- Riding modes (Urban and Rain) that adjust ABS sensitivity.
- Upside-down (USD) front forks and rear monoshock.
- LED headlamp and indicators.
Clearly, the Ronin is far more tech-loaded, giving it an edge for younger riders who demand modern conveniences and advanced riding aids.
Ride and Handling – Stability vs Flickability
Hunter 350
The Hunter’s weight (181 kg) provides excellent stability at highway speeds, making it a confidence-inspiring cruiser. However, in crowded city streets, it feels less agile due to its bulk. The suspension is basic with telescopic front forks and twin-shocks at the rear, tuned for comfort rather than sharp handling.
Ronin
At just 159 kg, the Ronin feels light, agile, and easy to maneuver. The upside-down forks in front and a monoshock at the rear give it a modern ride quality. It absorbs bumps better and feels planted while cornering. This makes the Ronin more suitable for riders who like a bit of sportiness along with practicality.
Highway and Touring Capability
- The Hunter 350 is the better choice for highway rides thanks to its heavier build, relaxed engine character, and stability at higher speeds. It feels more reassuring on longer rides, even if it isn’t the fastest.
- The Ronin is better suited for city commutes and short highway stints. While it can handle longer rides, it’s more about agility and ease rather than endurance cruising.
Fuel Efficiency
Both bikes offer respectable mileage considering their performance, with the Ronin having a slight edge due to its smaller displacement and lighter weight.
- Hunter 350: Around 30–36 km/l depending on conditions.
- Ronin: Around 35–40 km/l, making it more fuel-efficient in daily usage.
Pros and Cons at a Glance
| Aspect | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 | TVS Ronin |
| Price | ₹1.37–1.67 lakh | ₹1.25–1.59 lakh |
| Engine | 349cc, 20.2 bhp, 27 Nm | 225.9cc, 20 bhp, 19.93 Nm |
| Weight | 181 kg | 159 kg |
| Features | Analog-digital cluster, optional navigation, dual-channel ABS | Full-digital display, Bluetooth, riding modes, USD forks |
| Ride Character | Relaxed, stable, heritage feel | Agile, responsive, modern ride |
| Mileage | 30–36 km/l | 35–40 km/l |
| Ideal For | Riders wanting a classic, steady RE feel | Riders seeking modern tech and nimbleness |
Conclusion – Which One Should You Buy?
Choosing between the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and the TVS Ronin ultimately depends on your riding personality:
- Pick the Hunter 350 if you value heritage design, a steady thumping engine, highway stability, and the prestige of owning a Royal Enfield. It’s ideal for those who want a bike that blends tradition with city practicality.
- Go for the Ronin if you want a modern-looking, feature-rich motorcycle that is light, agile, and tech-savvy. It’s the better choice for city commuters, new riders, and those who enjoy a touch of sportiness in daily rides.
Both motorcycles represent excellent value in their segment, but they appeal to two very different mindsets—one rooted in classic motorcycling tradition, and the other embracing a forward-looking, modern approach.
